Legal Opinion

MacFarlane v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 531PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, C. J.

Ordinarily an Act of the General Assembly is only prospective in effect. Here, however, the Act is retroactive as to plaintiff and certain others named therein. The newly created court is expressly directed to consider their claims.

The General Assembly in 1951, by adopting ch. 1059, Session Laws 1951, now codified as General Statutes ch. 143, art. 31, granted a qualified or limited waiver of its immunity against suits for personal injury or property damage; created the Industrial Commission a court to hear the cause of any person who claims that he has been injured or his property has been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Leary v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Smith v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Watson v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API