Legal Opinion

King v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHill, J.

Conceding error in the charge on the first issue, the judgment must stand. The answer to the third issue bars plaintiff’s right to recover upon the principle that the release of one joint tort-feasor releases all. Holland v. Utilities Co., 208 N. C., 289, 180 S. E., 592; Howard v. Plumbing Co., 154 N. C., 224, 70 S. E., 285; Sircey v. Hans Rees’ Sons, 155 N. C., 296, 71 S. E., 310; Slade v. Sherrod, 175 N. C., 346, 95 S. E., 557; Braswell v. Morrow, 195 N. C., 127, 141 S. E., 489; Massey v. Public Service Co., 196 N. C., 299, 145 S. E., 561.

The plaintiff alleges that the Seaboard and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Sircey v. Hans Rees' SonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Howard v. J. H. Harris Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Slade v. . SherrodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Braswell v. . MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Simpson v. PlylerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. McNair Ex Rel. McNair v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Ramsey v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API