Legal Opinion

Sircey v. Hans Rees' Sons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Gouncill, Jat tbe December Term, 1910, of BuNCOMBe.

1Opinion of the Court

"Walker, J".

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury received by plaintiff, who was employed by the Southern Railway Company as a switchman, while moving a car of coal along a side track laid on defendant’s premises for its accom modation. Tbe particular allegation is that tbe plaintiff was required to mount tbe car while in motion in order to perform bis duties, and tbat in doing so be was caugbt between tbe side of tbe moving car and a pile of tan bark wbicb bad been placed so near tbe track as to endanger tbe employees of tbe railway company wben moving cars on tbe siding.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Gregg v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Brown v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API