Legal Opinion

Campau v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Theodore L. Campau against the city of Detroit to recover a balance claimed to be due for constructing a sewer. From a judgment for plaintiff for part of- his claim, both parties bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought t-o recover for a balance claimed to be due for constructing a sewer in Woodward avenue in the city of Detroit. There was a written contract between the parties, executed on behalf of the city by the board of public works. On the trial the two questions presented were — First, whether, under the contract, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the price per foot stipulated, as determined by measuring each cylinder as a separate sewer, or whether he was limited to the number of lineal feet of the entire substructure; and, second, whether the plaintiff was entitled to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McBrian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Detroit v. Michigan Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Rens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Utica State Savings Bank v. Village of Oak ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schneider v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wilson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Cass County v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Ridgemont Development Co. v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API