Campau v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Theodore L. Campau against the city of Detroit to recover a balance claimed to be due for constructing a sewer. From a judgment for plaintiff for part of- his claim, both parties bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action was brought t-o recover for a balance claimed to be due for constructing a sewer in Woodward avenue in the city of Detroit. There was a written contract between the parties, executed on behalf of the city by the board of public works. On the trial the two questions presented were — First, whether, under the contract, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the price per foot stipulated, as determined by measuring each cylinder as a separate sewer, or whether he was limited to the number of lineal feet of the entire substructure; and, second, whether the plaintiff was entitled to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McBrian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Rens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Utica State Savings Bank v. Village of Oak ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Schneider v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Cass County v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Ridgemont Development Co. v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.