Legal Opinion

Schneider v. City of Ann Arbor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case-made from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Emanuel L. Schneider against the city of Ann Arbor for a balance due under a sewer contract. Judgment for defendant :on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings case-made.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

In the summer of 1918 the defendant city contemplated the construction of two sewers in districts Nos. 56 and 60. On August 20th plaintiff submitted a proposal in which he offered to do all the excavation and back-filling at the following prices per lineal foot: Class 1, for trenches less than-6 feet deep, 35 cents; class 2, for trenches between 6 to 8 feet deep, 50 cents; class 3, for trenches between 8 and 10 feet deep, 80 cents; class 4, for trenches between 10 and 12 feet deep, 95 cents. On August 28th, he entered into a contract with the city to do this work at the figures named. There…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McBrian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lamson v. City of MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Rens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sittler v. Board of ControlMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Utica State Savings Bank v. Village of Oak ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Wilson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Chambless v. JJ Fritch, General Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API