McBrian v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On the 7th day of April, 1880, the plaintiffs, James McBrien and John S. Farr, entered into a contract with the city of Grand Rapids to construct the extension of the Winter-street sewer from its then terminus to the south line of North street, in the city of-Grand Rapids. By the terms of the contract the plaintiffs were to furnish all of the material, and do all of the work, in accordance with the plans, specifications and profile relating thereto, then on file in the office of the Board of Public Works of said city, which *96plan, specifications and profile were declared to be a part of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Brady v. . the Mayor, C., of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Hodges v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1846
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tobin v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Inge v. Board of Public Works of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Moore v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.