Legal Opinion

Ridgemont Development Co. v. City of East Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1960No. Docket 60, Calendar 47,583PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The facts in this controversy are not materially in dispute. In June, 1953, plaintiffs became the owners of a tract of land in defendant city, comprising approximately 89 acres. It is claimed that the consideration for the purchase was $440,000 and that the property was acquired with the purpose in mind of platting it. It was divided into 2 subdivisions and plats thereof were prepared by engineers employed by the owners for that purpose. The proposed plats were submitted to the common council of the city of East Detroit for approval, and referred to the city engineer. Some question was raised…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vyne v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Abells v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Ridgefield Land Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Alsmeier v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Detroit Club v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., and Sambar Properties, Inc. v. The City of Ann Arbor George W. Gardner and G. M. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. West Park Ave., Inc. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. Gordon v. Village of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Eyde Construction Co. v. Charter Township of MeridianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API