Legal Opinion

Utica State Savings Bank v. Village of Oak Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 39,136PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The plaintiff bank, as assignee of vendors under land contract, sought foreclosure in chancery against the defendant village, the vendee. The assignment was for sefcurity only and so the original vendors are also parties plaintiff. The contract in question is dated February 26,1929, and covers land purchased by the village, through its commission, which land was intended to be used as a site for a town hall. The purchase was authorized by a resolution dated February 26,1929, and adopted by four of the five village commissioners, one being absent. The resolution recited an appropriation of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. McBrian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. People ex rel. Butler v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Township of Dearborn v. Dearborn Township ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Hazel Park v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of Ecorse v. Peoples Community Hospital AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re MosbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API