Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Corson County Board of County Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2007No. 24003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The Corson County Board of Commissioners (Board or County) contracted with a private attorney to provide legal services for the County. The circuit court found that some of the contemplated legal services fell within the scope of the Corson County State’s Attorney’s duties. To that extent, the circuit court concluded that the contract was void because it usurped the duties of an elected state’s attorney. The Board appeals. We affirm and remand for modification of the judgment to conform to the circuit court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jensen v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Weger v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Burns v. KurtenbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kling v. SternSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Northstream Investments, Inc. v. 1804 Country Store Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hanks v. Corson County Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. SDIF Ltd. Partnership 6 v. Northern Beef Packers Ltd. Partnership (In re Northern Beef Packers Ltd. Partnership Tax ID/EIN 26-2530200)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API