Legal Opinion

Miller v. Jacobsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2006No. 23630, 23649PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Kimberly Kay Spieker Miller (Kimberly) filed a motion seeking modification of a child support obligation order and divorce decree from Todd Wayne Ja-cobsen (Todd). The trial court found facts sufficient to warrant an increase in Todd’s child support obligation but denied Kimberly’s motion to modify the divorce decree. We affirm on Issues 1, 2, 3, and 5 and remand Issue 4 to the trial court for a determination of when an upward deviation from the basic child support obligation for transportation needs ends.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Kimberly and Todd were…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nelson v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Masek v. MasekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Senger v. SengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Kreps v. KrepsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Pietrzak v. SchroederSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Terca v. TercaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. DFA Dairy Financing Services, L.P. v. Lawson Special TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API