Legal Opinion

Kling v. Stern

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2007No. 24146PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Kim and Chris Kling (Klings) sought a declaratory judgment that Judith Stern violated a restrictive covenant prohibiting the subdivision of land into parcels containing less than forty acres. The specific question was whether Stern violated the covenant when she subdivided the covenanted land into parcels of less than forty acres, but did so by “blending” the covenanted land with non-covenanted land to create “mixed” parcels that were forty acres or greater. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Stern allowing the blended parcel subdivision. Klings…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jensen v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Andrushchenko v. SilchukSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Lillibridge v. Meade School District 46-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co. v. DollySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API