Legal Opinion

Burns v. Kurtenbach

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1982No. 13896PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This is an original action in the nature of a quo warranto proceeding. We conclude that a judgment should be entered removing the defendants from their positions as school board members of the Brookings School District 5-1 and declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to be seated as school board member of that district.

Prior to the May 14,1982, deadline, plaintiff, Burns, and defendants, Kurtenbach and Scholten, as well as another individual, filed their nominating petitions for school board member with the business manager of Brookings School District 5-1. The school board…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Nist v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Corbly v. City of ColtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lucas v. RingsrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burke v. SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Weger v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cheney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API