Legal Opinion

Beckwith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2004No. 39084PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*25OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether the intentional misconduct of an intoxicated insured is covered under a homeowner’s personal third-party liability policy. We conclude that, regardless of the insured’s intoxicated state, the act of striking another is intentional, that such an act is not a covered occurrence under the policy in question here, and that such incidents are subject to a properly drafted “intentional acts” exclusion clause. Consequently, we hold that the liability insurer in this instance is under no duty to defend or indemnify its insured in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hanover Insurance Co. v. NewcomerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Wessinger v. Fire Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  5. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Big-D Construction Corp. v. Take it for Granite TooDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  3. Fire Insurance Exchange v. CornellNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance v. SandersDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  5. Hunt v. AAA Nev. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API