Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance Co. v. Newcomer
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 1979No. 29813PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
Appeal from declaratory judgment, concluding that policy afforded no coverage for actions of insured within the terms of the policy. Affirmed.
This case, having been tried to the court, is reviewed and disposed of pursuant to Rule 73.01.
Appellant Douglas B. Newcomer was a named insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by respondent.
On June 15, 1974, Newcomer and Samantha Locke went to an afternoon party. They returned to Miss Locke’s residence at approximately 5:30 p. m. At 7:00 p. m., Newcomer and Miss Locke attended another party until sometime between 11:30 p. m. and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Ruby WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- MacKinnon v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Spivey v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PacchettiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Hanover Insurance v. TalhouniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.