Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1997No. CV-96-0396-PRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*185OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

Ohio Casualty Insurance Company sought review of a court of appeals’ opinion holding the “expected or intended” injury exclusion in a homeowner’s insurance policy did not apply when the insured, Joel Henderson, committed an armed robbery that resulted in the death of Padriac Hill. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Henderson, 187 Ariz. 155, 927 P.2d 815 (1996). We granted review to determine if Henderson’s active participation in the planning, preparation, and commission of a violent armed robbery fell within the exclusion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Farrer v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Landry v. LeonardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Hoffman v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API