Legal Opinion

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Cornell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2004No. 39510PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we consider whether the enforceability and scope of exclusionary language in a homeowner’s liability insurance policy for intentional acts and child molestation is ambiguous. We conclude that the policy, by its terms, unambiguously excludes coverage in connection with claims for negligent supervision of an adult child who commits statutory sexual seduction.

FACTS

Nineteen-year-old Milton Hernandez, a/k/a Milton Cortez, engaged in sexual intercourse with his twelve-year-old neighbor. State prosecution followed and Hernandez pleaded guilty to four counts of statutory sexual…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. B.B. v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Clark v. Truck Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Old Republic InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Big-D Construction Corp. v. Take it for Granite TooDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  3. Hunt v. AAA Nev. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  4. Allstate Indemnity Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Allstate Indemnity Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API