Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Sanders
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 5, 2007No. 3:06-cv-00376PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HICKS, District Judge.
Presently before the court, are cross-motions for summary judgment (## 15, 16 1 ). Both the Plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), and the Defendant, David Edington (“Edington”), have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Edington filed an opposition and cross-motion (# 16) to which Allstate replied (# 17). Edington subsequently replied in support of his cross-motion (# 19).
I. Factual Background
This matter centers around an insurance coverage dispute arising from an incident that occurred on October…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brinson v. Linda Rose Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James K. Burns Patricia Ross Walter H. Ratcliff v. International Insurance Co. Crum & ForsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hunt v. AAA Nev. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Jaynes Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Liberty Insurance Corporation v. HohmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Red Rock HoundsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021