Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Farmer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, setting aside a judgment by default.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Judgment by default was rendered against defendant in the municipal court of St. Paul, upon the return of a police officer that he had served the summons upon defendant in the city of St. Paul, Eamsey county, by leaving a copy at his last usual abode, with a person of suitable age and discretion then resident therein. Subsequently the judgment was vacated, on motion of defendant made on affidavits showing that he was not and never had been a resident of Eamsey county, but at the time of the alleged service was and ever since has been a resident of Steele county. The plaintiff presented no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bond v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Carr v. Commercial Bank of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Jensen v. CrevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dubois v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Ray v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Wall v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  4. Kempner v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Farmer v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API