Legal Opinion

Van DeRyt v. Van DeRyt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1966No. 39594PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

Although the record may read like a comedy to some, to those who esteem the integrity of the administration of justice and the sanctity of marriage the record unravels a tragic story.

The spectre of collusion lurks beyond the page corners of the record, eluding definite proof. The case at bar, in our day, justifies the following perceptive statement of Judge Hitchcock in Harter v. Harter (1832), 5 Ohio 318, 319:

“Perhaps there is no statute in Ohio more abused than the statute concerning ‘divorce and alimony.’ Perhaps there is no statute under which greater imposition, is practiced upon the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jelm v. JelmOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Reinbolt v. ReinboltOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gilpin v. GilpinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Thirty-Four Corp. v. Sixty-Seven Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API