Legal Opinion

Farole v. Eichman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1952No. L. A. 22372PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

A bicycle upon which plaintiff was riding with another boy was struck by a truck owned by defendant corporation and driven by defendant Eichman. A jury awarded plaintiff damages for the injuries which he received, and defendants have appealed from the judgment rendered against them.

On the day of the accident plaintiff, who was 14 years old, and his friend, Louis, 15, were together at the intersection of Broadway and Junípero in the city of Long Beach. The two boys spent some time in a drugstore on the northeast corner of the intersection and then left there intending to cross Broadway to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hopkins v. Galland Mercantile Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Leek v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Sharick v. GallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mark v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Capolungo v. BondiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Espinoza v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Kading v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API