Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Galland Mercantile Laundry Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14815PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In order to give a' more thorough consideration to the questions of law presented by the petition herein than it was possible under our system to give to them at the time the petition for hearing was first before us, this cause was ordered before us for further consideration and examination. Our further consideration of the case has led us to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, Second Division, Sturtevant, J., writing the opinion of the court, has correctly applied the law to the facts of the instant case, and its conclusion should be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Village of Wonewoc v. TaubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Snyder Et Ux. v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Peoples Rapid Transit Co. v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Morris v. Purity Sausage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Meincke v. Oakland Garage, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City of Industry v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API