Legal Opinion
Schafer v. Faylor
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1944No. 18089PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The parties will be designated in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant.
This is an action for specific performance, which has for its basis the following instrument:
“Jan. 29, 1943
“Received of Stanley C. Schafer one hundred $100 cash. Payment on 83 acres farm in Brimfield Twp. $2,900 to be paid within 60 day balance of $6,000 to be paid at 30 per month at 4%% interest every sis month. Total price $9,000.
“Arthur Faylor
“Stanley C. Schafer”
Certain evidence was introduced by plaintiff over objection by defendant, and some evidence was intro duced by defendant. The trial court found in favor of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Ruzicka v. HotovyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Jacobs v. Joseph E. Copp Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Lily Penn Food Stores, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Phillips v. May, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.