Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Joseph E. Copp Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1930No. 22263PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This is an action at law for the collection of a real estate broker’s commission. The action is based upon a written contract. The written contract reads:
“Dayton, Ohio, June 3, 1926.
“I hereby agree to trade the propertys known as Exhibit ‘A’ listed on reverse side of this contract in the city of Dayton, county of Montgomery, and state of Ohio. Subject, however, to the following terms: Total loans of $53,800 more or less, & valued at $127,000, leaving an equity more or less of $73,200, and agree to assign all contracts of sale on the above stipulated properties, for the property at N. E.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Park v. AciernoOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Buratti & Montandon v. TennantTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Schmidt v. WestonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Schafer v. FaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Cairelli v. BrunnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.