North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P. J.
A franchised retailer of gourmet cookies and ice cream negotiated to purchase assets and the leasehold of a confectionary store in a prestigious shopping mall. The trial court ruled that those negotiations produced a binding agreement between the plaintiff-purchaser and the defendant-seller. The court entered extensive findings and conclusions, ordered specific performance of their agreement, and enjoined a competitor cookie company from interfering with the transaction. All parties appeal.
I. The Issues
Each of the parties fails to comply with the requirements of App. R. 16(A) and Local App.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. LaneOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Shady Acres Nursing Home, Inc. v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Park v. AciernoOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ford v. Tandy Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Oglebay Norton Co. v. Armco, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Landskroner v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.