Legal Opinion
Wooton v. McAdoo
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1930No. Docket No. 139PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
These two actions were consolidated for trial and from a judgment entered as applying to each case, this appeal is taken.
The plaintiffs in each case are the owners of a lot twéntyfive feet wide and fifty feet deep, on the outskirts of the Huntington Beach oil-field. The two lots adjoin, and taken together, formed a unit of land large enough to hold a derrick for drilling, but not of sufficient size to hold such a derrick and also the boiler and other equipment necessary to operate the same. The defendants in these two eases were the owners of a lease upon another lot situated 117 feet from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Brookshire Oil Co. v. Casmalia Ranch Oil & Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Taylor v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Gibbs v. SeegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bacigalupi v. Western MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Black Light Corp. v. Ultra-Violet Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lewis v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.