Legal Opinion

Bacigalupi v. Western MacHinery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1933No. Docket No. 4955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs Louie, John and Ernest Bacigalupi, for the sum of $750 as damages for the dismantling, removal and conversion of certain mining machinery, fixtures and improvements. The judgment was rendered against the defendants Western Machinery Company, H. & H. Mining Corporation, Sam Hamilton and H. Hollanby. No judgment was entered against the defendant Jno. L. Witney Company. Prom the judgment which was rendered against them, the defendants Western Machinery Company and Sam Hamilton, only, have appealed.

The appellants contend that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bemis v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Southern Pacific Land Co. v. KigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Conde v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Brush v. E. R. Bohan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mohawk Valley Fuel Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Oakley Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API