Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rudnick v. Delfino

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1956No. Civ. 4991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal by one of the defendants, Harold V. Smith, from an order denying his motion for a change of venue from Kern County to San Bernardino County.

Plaintiff “Oscar Rudnick, individually and as a copartner of Imperial Land and Cattle Company, a copartnership ’ ’ sues for a dissolution of Silver River Ranch, a limited partnership, for an accounting and a decree directing the division and distribution of the partnership assets. The verified complaint alleges that the members of the copartnership originally consisted of Oscar Rudnick, Harold Y. Smith, Delfino…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Donohoe v. WoosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Epstein v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Barron v. KoenigIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Riddle v. LushingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API