Legal Opinion
TV Interactive Data Corp. v. Sony Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 11, 2013No. Case No. 3:10-cv-00475-JCSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DAUBERT MOTIONS.
Dkt. Nos. 546, 548.
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are Motions in Limine re Dcmberb filed by Plaintiff TV Interactive Data Corporation (“TVI”), and Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., and Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC (collectively “Sony”). TVI and Sony both contend that certain testimony from the opposing party’s experts must be excluded *1010because the information is unreliable and thus inadmissible under Rule 702 and Daubert. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Khoday v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Delta T, LLC v. Dan's Fan City, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OYDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.