Legal Opinion

Khoday v. Symantec Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 27, 2015No. Civil No. 11-180 (JRT/TNL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Named Plaintiffs Devi Khoday and Denise Townsend bring this class action against Defendants Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) and Digital River, Inc. (“Digital River”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for misrepresentations the Plaintiffs allege Defendants, made in connection with the sale of download insurance between 2005 and 2011. The Plaintiffs allege violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act, and unjust enrichment. This…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
  3. Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  4. Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  5. Beaty v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API