Legal Opinion

Short v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1984No. 8310SC1152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the court erred in admitting evidence of experimental test drives by expert witnesses for defendant. The rule regarding admissibility of evidence of experiments is set forth in State v. Jones, 287 N.C. 84, 98, 214 S.E. 2d 24, 34 (1975), as follows:

Although experimental evidence should be received with great care, it is admissible when the trial judge finds it to be relevant and of probative value. Even upon such finding the admission of experimental evidence is always subject to the further restriction that the circumstances of the experiment must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Cline v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Jones (Griffin) v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Addison v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API