State v. Satterfield

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the court erroneously overruled his objection to alleged hearsay testimony relating to the presence' of a car near the prosecuting witness’ house. There is no question but that the testimony was hearsay and initially considered admissible by the trial court. However, once the. trial court ascertained the inadmissiblility of the testimony, it properly excluded the testimony and sufficiently advised the jury to disabuse from their minds all reference to the hearsay testimony. As our Court has previously stated:

• “ ‘Where evidence is improperly…