Legal Opinion

Finn v. Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1916No. Docket No. 158PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board. Alma Maud Finn presented her claim for compensation against the Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City Railway for the death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarditfg compensation, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This proceeding involves the review of a decision of the State Industrial Accident Board in affirming the conclusions of an arbitration committee awarding to complainant full compensation for the death of her husband under the provisions of Act No. 10, Extra Session 1912 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5428 et seq.).

On May 9, 1914, William Finn, claimant’s husband, while employed by respondent as an assistant engineer in its power house at New Baltimore, Mich., sustained fatal injuries by a boiler explosion, as a result of which he died two days later in a hospital at Mt. Clemens, Mich. Claimant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clark v. HoveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Schroetke v. Jackson-Church Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Roberts v. WhaleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API