Legal Opinion
Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1996No. 22587PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
Jack Key and Jack Key Motor Company, Inc. (Key) sued Chrysler Motors Corporation (Chrysler), alleging that Chrysler had unreasonably withheld its consent to the transfer of a Chrysler/Plymouth dealership franchise from the Borman Motor Company (Borman) to Key in violation of the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Dealers Franchising Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-16-1 to -16 (Repl.Pamp.1995) (the Act). After a bench trial, the district court concluded that the Act granted Key standing, found that Chrysler had acted unreasonably in violation of the Act, and awarded Key $300,000 in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Public Service Co. v. Diamond D Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.