Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1983No. Civ. 64788PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Petitioners United States Steel Corporation and Alside, Inc. have appealed the denial of their petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent Franchise Tax Board (hereinafter the Board) to schedule a hearing within 30 days to consider petitioners’ protest of certain additional tax assessments and to render a decision on the protest within 45 days of the hearing.
The denial of the petition by the superior court was an appealable order, and thus the appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1110; Bloom v. Municipal Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 71, 74-75 [127 Cal.Rptr. 317, 545…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Edison California Stores, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Duffy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hepner v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Park 'N Fly of San Francisco, Inc. v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.