Legal Opinion
Park 'N Fly of San Francisco, Inc. v. City of South San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1987No. A029879PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
Appellant 1 brought an action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging the validity and application of an ordinance enacted by the City of South San Francisco (hereafter referred to as respondent or the City) imposing a business license tax upon operators of commercial parking facilities. (Ord. No. 904-82, hereafter referred to as the ordinance.) After a court trial the ordinance was found “constitutional, valid and enforceable and ... applicable” to appellant.
The ordinance was enacted as a revenue measure in September of 1982, and became effective January 1, 1983.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. TijerinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Williams v. Housing Authority of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- ANDAL v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Shiseido Cosmetics (America) Ltd. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.