Legal Opinion
Fink v. Time Warner Cable
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 6, 2013No. 12-0299-cvPublishedCited by 392 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-Appellants Jessica Fink and Brett Noia (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Laura Taylor Swain, Judge) dismissing their Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude that the allegations stated in the Complaint—'which raise claims related to deceptive advertising by Defendant-Appellee Time Warner Cable (“Time Warner”)—lack facial plausibility sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by392 opinions
- Jennifer Beardsall v. CVS Pharmacy, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Mantikas ex rel. Situated v. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Chen v. Dunkin' Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Bellin v. ZuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.