Legal Opinion

Good Samaritan Hospital v. Stoddard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1994No. 91-14419, 90-20316, 91-03626; CA A78338PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Employer, Good Samaritan Hospital, seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee’s holding that claimant’s wrist claim was not barred by a previous settlement claiming that the Board committed legal error.1 We reverse.

These facts found by the referee and adopted by the Board are supported by substantial evidence. On January 6, 1990, while claimant was working for employer as a nurse’s assistant, her right wrist was injured when a patient grabbed it and bent it backward. Claimant’s physician, Dr. Brown, and her treating orthopedist, Dr. Cohen, diagnosed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trevitts v. Hoffman-MarmolejoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WolffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Pollock v. Tri-Met, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Taylor v. MillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Fitzsimmons v. Island City SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API