Trevitts v. Hoffman-Marmolejo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed the referee’s holding that a claim disposition agreement (CDA) entered into pursuant to ORS 656.236 1 barred claimant from recovering all nonmedical benefits on his claim. We review for errors of law and substantial evidence, ORS 656.298(6), ORS 183.482(7), (8), and affirm.
On August 15, 1989, claimant sustained a compen-sable, disabling low back injury that was accepted on September 14,1989. After x-rays revealed a lumbar disc protrusion, claimant’s attending surgeon, Brett, performed an L4-5 dis-kectomy on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Slocum v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Paragano v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- P & C Construction Co. v. American Diversified/Wells Park IICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- D & D CO. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Gilbert v. Cavenham Forest Industries DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Neighbors v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Stoltz v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.