Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Tri-Met, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1996No. Agency No. 94-10269; CA A92228PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that upheld employer’s denial of claimant’s aggravation claim for right shoulder bursitis. The Board reasoned that the compensability of the aggravation claim was an issue that claimant could have raised before entering into a settlement regarding other pending claims. Consequently, the Board concluded that the settlement agreement barred claimant from raising the issue. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a)(A), and reverse.

Claimant is a Tri-Met bus driver. Between July 1993 and February 1994, she filed three workers’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Good Samaritan Hospital v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. International Paper Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Delta Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. McGrew v. Express Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API