Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Wolff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. WCB 93-06586; CA A93849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in concluding that it is precluded from denying the compensa-bility of claimant’s osteochondritis dissecans. We agree with employer that its denial is not barred, and reverse the Board’s order.

Claimant compensably injured his knee in 1980. The claim was accepted as a contusion. Following surgery, the September 21, 1981, closing report of claimant’s treating physician diagnosed

“[o]steochondritis dissecans with a large fragment having been removed, with chondromalacia of the patella. Most…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet WorksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Good Samaritan Hospital v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. North Pacific Insurance v. Wilson's Distributing Service, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. WolffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Robuck v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API