Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Mill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1996No. 94-00753; CA A87505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) upholding Industrial Indemnity’s (carrier) denial of medical services benefits. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Claimant sustained a compensable injury in 1967, and his treatment included chiropractic procedures. On December 1,1987, carrier refused to pay for more than two chiropractic treatments per month. On June 20,1988, the parties entered into a disputed claims settlement (DCS), which provided, among other things:

“The carrier’s denial limiting claimant’s medical treatment to two times per month…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Good Samaritan Hospital v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Trevitts v. Hoffman-MarmolejoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Carlson v. Valley MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGrew v. Express Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API