Legal Opinion

Nunziato Di Felice Fu Vincenzo v. Richwood Banking & Trust Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeRedith, Judge:

Plaintiff, on September 20, 1921, instituted his action of assumpsit to recover $1150, money of the plaintiff had and received by the defendant, and obtained a verdict and judgment for the full amount. The declaration consists of the common counts and is accompanied by the following bill of particulars:

*370'“Richwood Banking and Trust Company, a corporation.

To Nunciato Be Felice Fu- Vincenzo Dr.

May 17th, 1919 — To money had and received by defendant for the use of the plaintiff. .$1000.00.

Nov. 17, 1921, To interest on above amount from May 17, 1919, to Nov. 17, 1921. 150.00

Total…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Jackson v. HoughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pinkney v. Kanawha Valley BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. West Virginia Architects & Builders v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. MedingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association and Robert G. Litolff v. William HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Lebowitz v. McPikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Duty v. Williamson Hudson-Essex Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API