Legal Opinion
Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association and Robert G. Litolff v. William Hayden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1956No. 14239PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDBERG, District Judge.
This is an action brought in federal court on the grounds of diverse citizenship, appellant bank having its principal place of business in San Francisco, California ; appellant Litolff being an officer at the Placerville, California branch of the bank; and appellee being a resident of the State of Utah at the time of filing his complaint and a resident of Oregon at the time of trial. Appellee, William Hayden, as plaintiff filed suit against the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (hereinafter referred to as Bank) and Robert G. Litolff as defendants.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Sher v. De HavenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Dickins v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Roach v. HulingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Dorothy R. McCord v. John Patrick MaguireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Trinity Carton Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.