Legal Opinion

Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1908PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Fayette County. Action by Thomas Bannister against the Victoria Coal & Coke Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

Plaintiff and defendant, June 1, 1901, entered into an ex-ecutory contract whereby the plaintiff bound himself to mine and deliver all coal in a certain area of land containing about 40 acres, for 68 cents per ton, said area to be worked and laid off according to plans outlined by the superintendent and engineer of the defendant. By the contract it was understood and agreed that, as the property was then undeveloped, all developments prospective should be done at the *504expense of the plaintiff, said 68 cents to include all costs of whatever kind with the exception of props, ties…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Transportation Co. v. Standard Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Henry v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sheppard v. Peabody Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Viramontes v. FoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Mollohan v. Black Rock Contracting, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wood & Brooks Co. v. D. E. Hewit Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API