Jackson v. Hough
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited Bisli. Const. Law §§ 438, 457, 458; Bisli. Stat. Or. § 1030 ; 2 W. Ya. 517; 11 Wheat. 258; 1 Band. 98; 32 Ala. < 30; 11 Ilumph. 1 ; 26 Yt. 184; 1 Par. Const. 458; 1 Taunt. 136 ; Code, c. 32, s. 2. cited 4 Min. Inst. 576; 4 Rob. Pr. 497, 498 ; 23 IV. Ya. 619, 632; 18 W. Ya. 630; 5 W. Ya. 190 ; 9 Leigh 532.
1Opinion of the Court
BRANNON, JUDGE :
Jackson brought assumpsit against Hough and recovered *238judgment, and Hough brought the case up by writ of error. Hough wanted to sell his farm. Jackson thought ho could make something by selling it. He knew Adams wanted to buy a farm, and without knowledge or request of Hough went to Adams, and negotiated with him a sale of the Hough farm for six thousand dollars, payable insix bonds on Sharpueck of one thousand each, given to Adams. After this agreement between Jackson and Adams, Adams sent for Ilough. Hough’s price for his farm was five thousand dollars. When Ilough came,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gunn v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Thompson v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1872
- Moore v. Supervisors of Wetzel CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by33 opinions
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. CliffordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
- Thomas v. Electrical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.