Legal Opinion

Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 24, 1918PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of city of Norfolk, on a proceeding by motion for a judgment for money. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This is a proceeding by motion for a judgment for money, under section 3211 of the Code. The notice alleges that R. L. Portlock had given a deed of trust on certain real estate *383described in the notice to secure the payment of three negotiable notes particularly described in the notice, and that Portlock had thereafter sold and conveyed the land to the defendant who, as a part of the consideration for the conveyance, had expressly assumed the payment of said notes; that the notes had not been paid; that the real estate had been sold for the default; and that after crediting the notes with the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Morrison v. BestlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  4. Ward v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API