Legal Opinion

Mattox v. State, Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2014No. 6896 S-14587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A former inmate brought an action against the Department of Corrections alleging that the Department negligently failed to protect him after he reported being threatened and that he was subsequently assaulted and seriously injured while in prison. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the Department, concluding that the inmate had not shown that a genuine issue of material fact existed on the question whether the Department breached its duty to protect him from reasonably foreseeable harm. Specifically, the superior court concluded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grieveson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Dale v. PostonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Sanchez v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Butler Ex Rel. Biller v. BayerNevada Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Jovanov v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Mattox v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Beebe v. State of AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API