Nelson v. Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or Corporations
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Jay Dee Nelson and Shannon Nelson have four minor children. One of the Nelson children was handling a Smith & Wesson (“S & W”) revolver when the gun discharged and struck another Nelson child, causing her to become a paraplegic. The Nelsons filed a products liability action against S & W, bringing claims of negligence, failure to warn, strict liability, and failure to retrofit. The district court granted S & W’s motion to dismiss and denied the Nelsons’ post-dismissal mo tions. The Nelsons appeal these decisions, and we affirm.
First, the Nelsons allege that S & W should have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. WillisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ismail v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Ismail v. FreemanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Matilla v. NorthWestern CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025