Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Original Smith & Wesson Business Entities and/or Corporations

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2011No. 10-35562UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Jay Dee Nelson and Shannon Nelson have four minor children. One of the Nelson children was handling a Smith & Wesson (“S & W”) revolver when the gun discharged and struck another Nelson child, causing her to become a paraplegic. The Nelsons filed a products liability action against S & W, bringing claims of negligence, failure to warn, strict liability, and failure to retrofit. The district court granted S & W’s motion to dismiss and denied the Nelsons’ post-dismissal mo tions. The Nelsons appeal these decisions, and we affirm.

First, the Nelsons allege that S & W should have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. WillisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ismail v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  2. Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Ismail v. FreemanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Matilla v. NorthWestern CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API