Ensign Painting Co. v. Alfred A. Smith, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.
Plaintiff contracted to paint a building which had been erected by defendant.
The oral negotiations contemplated exterior painting only but the purchase order for the agreed price issued subsequent to these negotiations included interior painting.
The exterior painting was completed and the plaintiff paid for his work. Later, another purchase order for “additional work” was issued to plaintiff and he did some of it.
Plaintiff brought suit to collect for this work and defendant refused payment on the ground that it was to have been included in the original contract.
The trial court, sitting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Tuuk v. AndersenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Trans-American Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Canvasser Custom Builders, Inc. v. SeskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Skinner v. DME CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Turner Associates, Inc. v. Small Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.