Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Jackoboice
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Case made from Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs assign error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Plaintiffs are publishers of the Lumber Worker. On September 10, 1891, defendant gave to plaintiffs the following written order:
“The Lumber Worker Co.,
^Cincinnati, O.:
“Please insert my advertisement in the Lumber Worker 12 months, to .occupy -J page, for which we agree to pay you or order the sum of $24, payable quarterly.
“.Joseph Jackoboice.”
After plaintiffs had published' said advertisement for six months, defendant wrote them to discontinue the advertisement, and sent them the amount due to date. Plaintiffs continued the publication to the end of the year, and sued to recover the balance.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Linsley v. LovelySupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Alcorn v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bird v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Tradesman Co. v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Johnson v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.